This said, economists do seem to be better at
explaining things than they are at predicting them, and maybe if people behaved
more like the idealisations then economic behaviour would be easier to predict.
My suggestion is that we make a lot of artificially intelligent robots that
really do behave like that, give them a bunch of money and release them into
society.
Part of the beauty of this is that economies
would become more predictable. The other part is that we could programme the
robots to have the preferences we have but aren’t rational enough to maximise
even when we have the means to do so. If we want more hospitals built, we could
entrust their construction to corruptible, fallible humans, or to
incorruptible, infallible, single-minded robots. The hospitals would be built
as efficiently as possible, and as an added bonus the robot would be delighted.
I’ve long wondered why the government can’t
stimulate the economy by pumping a load of money into international
development, so the world gets developed by the invisible hands of the profit
motive instead of by the sporadic largesse of the notoriously self-obsessed, myopic and capricious general public. I’m sure there’s a reason we can’t do this, or we’d have done
it. But even if governments can’t create a market for that sort of thing, I
don’t see why a rampaging rabble of rich rational robots couldn’t. It that pays
the piper calls the tune.
No comments:
Post a Comment