I played Magic: The Gathering a few times a while ago, but I never really
got into it. I like games and I quite like most of the idea of this one, but
there’s one feature that puts me off. It’s not the wizards and magic element; I
don’t care about that one way or the other. It’s the building your own deck
element. For those of you who don’t know, Magic
is a card-based game, where each player uses their own personal deck of cards.
You don’t use a standard deck; you put together a deck with good cards in it,
to give yourself an advantage. A deck can be good by containing cards which are
good in themselves, and by having cards that work well together. This
leads to the Magic experience having
two parts: playing the game, and buying and trading cards to produce a kick-ass
deck. The second part can get quite expensive if you take it seriously, although
I don’t see that this in itself should put you off when you compare it with
other leisure activities like playing golf, going to the football or drinking
in a pub.
Anyway, when I play a game I want it to be
fair, either by being roughly symmetrical (like chess) or by having a
well-organized handicapping system (like golf). And I suppose that for me the collecting part of the Magic
hobby is not only unappealing in itself, but also spoils the playing part. I’d
prefer it if the cards were dealt randomly from a communal deck. People could
still collect fancy cards to add new elements to the game, although since fancy
cards wouldn’t give their owner an advantage people wouldn’t want them so badly
and the Wizards of the Coast wouldn’t make so much money. So it won’t happen.
Oh well.
When I was thinking about why I don’t like Magic, I thought of how Scrabble could
be modified in a similar way, and that I wouldn’t like that either. The
corresponding modification to Scrabble would be for each player to have their
own customized bag of tiles, instead of both drawing from a standard communal
one. There would have to be some restrictions on what a bag could contain to
stop people just having a bag full of blanks and laying down bingo after bingo,
although thinking about it this would probably lose to a bag with mostly blanks
and the odd high-scoring letter, so perhaps the unrestricted version would have some interest. But this would be feasible, and I understand there are restrictions on Magic decks too. Corresponding to the fancy
new cards in Magic, you could have
fancy new tiles, like a tile that could be any vowel (maybe scoring ½), or a
tile which turned its square into a double word score, or increased the values of adjoining tiles. There are all kinds of
possibilities.
Now, I’ve already said that I wouldn’t
welcome this modification to Scrabble myself, but the kind of people who like Magic might, and I wouldn’t mind them
sending some of their money my way. I could call it Words with Enemies. I doubt the makers of Words with Friends would have the front to sue me for making a
minor modification to their idea and marketing it as my own. That would be ridiculous.
